Penal Code section 995 motion

Jay Leiderman
By: Jay Leiderman
September 05 2016

PENAL CODE SECTION 995 MOTION TO SET ASIDE INDICTMENT

California Penal Code § 995 provides, in relevant part, that an indictment “shall be set aside” where (1) “it is not found, endorsed, and presented as prescribed in this code,” or (2) “the defendant has been indicted without reasonable or probable cause.”  “Preliminary hearings and Penal Code section 995 motions operate as a judicial check on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion and help ensure that the defendant is not charged excessively.”  (People v. Plengsangtip (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 825, 835 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].)  Courts ruling on a Penal Code section 995 motion look to whether the preliminary hearing or grand jury contained “sufficient competent evidence” to conclude there exists “probable cause to believe that a crime had been committed and that the defendant had committed it.”  (People v. Lopez (1975) 52 Cal.App.3d 263, 265-266.)  While the evidentiary showing required is low, the complete failure to present evidence on an essential element of a crime requires dismissal of the allegation.  (Thompson v. Superior Court (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 144, 148 [“to withstand a section 871 or Penal Code section 995 motion to dismiss, the People must make some showing as to the existence of each element of the charged offense”].)  As ever, probable cause is evaluated by looking to the totality of the circumstances.  (See Illinois v. Gates (1983) 462 U.S. 213, 238.)

 

Penal Code 995 Motion
Ventura County, California Defense Lawyer and Certified Criminal Law Specialist Jay Leiderman on his way to court.

 

18 thoughts on “Penal Code section 995 motion

  1. Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your web site, how could
    i subscribe for a weblog site? The account helped me a applicable deal.
    I were tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered shiny transparent idea

  2. Bob Dylan, “Hurricane”
    Bob Dylan’s tragic true story about boxer Rubin “Hurricane” Carter. Included on 1976’s Desire, “Hurricane” profiled Carter’s wrongful conviction for a triple homicide in 1966. Despite little evidence tying Carter and his friend to the crime scene, a jury still convicted the boxer. Dylan’s song points out the police injustice in the case, and while the track helped gain support for a new trial, Carter was once again found guilty in 1976. Carter was finally released from prison almost 10 years later.
    Southern Poverty Law Center
    https://www.splcenter.org/

    Clemency Project 2014
    https://www.clemencyproject2014.org/

  3. American Society for Industrial Security – ASIS
    The American Society for Industrial Security (ASIS) is the preeminent international organization for professionals responsible for security, including managers and directors of security. ASIS is dedicated to increasing the effectiveness and productivity of security practices through educational programs and materials.
    URL: http://www.asisonline.org/

  4. “It was not by accident or coincidence that the rights to freedom in
    speech and press were coupled in a single guaranty with the rights of
    the people peaceably to assemble and to petition for redress of
    grievances. All these, though not identical, are inseparable.
    They are cognate rights, and therefore are united in the first
    Article’s assurance.”
    Judge Wiley B. Rutledge
    [Wiley Blount Rutledge] U.S. Supreme Court Justice
    Source: Thomas v. Collins, 1944

  5. I’m really impressed with your writing skills and also with the
    layout to your blog. Is that this a paid subject or did you modify it
    yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it is uncommon to see a great blog like this one
    today..

  6. Computer Maintenance Competition Assurance Act
    Title III of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Computer Maintenance Competition Assurance Act, broadened Section 117 of the Copyright Act to allow third-party maintenance organizations to used software licensed to a computer’s owner or lessee as part of their maintenance activities, overriding the Ninth Circuit’s 1993 decision in MAI v. Peak.

    That case held that “the loading of software into a computer constitutes the creation of a copy under the Copyright Act,” and because Peak, as a third-party maintenance company, did not have permission under the licenses to the computer owners to load the MAI’s maintenance software in preparation for running it, Peak infringed MAI’s copyrights.

    Rather than say that information stored in RAM is not a “copy” as used in the Copyright Act, Congress instead provided a narrow exception to infringement “for the owner or lessee of a machine to make or authorize the making of a copy of a computer program if such copy is made solely by virtue of the activation of a machine that lawfully contains an authorized copy of the computer program, for purposes only of maintenance or repair of that machine,” as long as specified conditions are met.

  7. The other way for the prosecutor to go forward to trial is to file an initial charging document (a “complaint”) and then conduct a preliminary hearing. At the preliminary hearing, they must prove each and every charge (both felonies and misdemeanors) as well as any conduct enhancements such as firearm use, great bodily injury allegations, etc. They must prove the charges to a judge by a probable cause (or “reasonable cause”) standard. It’s a fairly low burden of proof, but it still has to be met. If the prosecution is able to put on sufficient evidence at the preliminary hearing and the judge holds you for trial, the prosecutor then files a new charging document called an “information”.

  8. In felony cases, there are several procedural safeguards in place before your case goes to trial. In California, there are two ways for your felony to move forward – either by an indictment by the grand jury or based on the filing of charges and after a preliminary hearing.

    The District Attorney can choose to take your felony case to the Grand Jury. If so, there are certain procedures they must follow, but if the Grand Jury hears the evidence and decides to indict you, they issue a “true bill”. The District Attorney then files a charging document in court called an indictment. That indictment lists the charges the prosecutor believes they have proven to the Grand Jury and unless something happens, those are the charges you will face at trial.

  9. Your lawyer need not bring a 995 motion. Your lawyer will file a 955 motion when he wants to ask the judge to dismiss the case against you. This will only happen if the lawyer thinks that one or more of your constitutional rights were violated at the preliminary hearing or if the lawyer thinks that there was not sufficient evidence to hold you to answer to the charges the prosecution alleges. If the judge agrees with your lawyer, the judge will dismiss the felony case against you.

  10. What Is a Penal Code 995 Motion Under California Law?

    In any felony case, there is often a discussion by defense counsel of a “995 Motion.” What is this motion? What is it for? Why do most attorneys believe it is an important motion to file? When is it filed?

    A motion under Penal Code § 995 is known as a “995 Motion.” It asks a judge to dismiss the whole or just parts of an information (the criminal complaint after a preliminary hearing) when the judge at the preliminary hearing in the matter failed to do so. People v. Hudson (1917) 35 Cal.App. 234, 237.

  11. Penal Code section 995:

    (a) Subject to subdivision (b) of Section 995a, the indictment or information shall be set aside by the court in which the defendant is arraigned, upon his or her motion, in either of the following cases:
    (1) If it is an indictment:
    (A) Where it is not found, endorsed, and presented as prescribed in this code.
    (B) That the defendant has been indicted without reasonable or probable cause.
    (2) If it is an information:
    (A) That before the filing thereof the defendant had not been legally committed by a magistrate.
    (B) That the defendant had been committed without reasonable or probable cause.
    (b) In cases in which the procedure set out in subdivision (b) of Section 995a is utilized, the court shall reserve a final ruling on the motion until those procedures have been completed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *