Jay Leiderman Quoted: Prosecutorial discretion: let’s haul that kid in front of the judge to scare him – NOT

Jay Leiderman
By: Jay Leiderman
December 17 2014

Jay Leiderman on prosecutorial discretion and the lack of its exercise in CFAA cases

“The days of ‘Let’s haul this kid in front of the judge, scare him and send him home with a warning’ are long since gone,” says attorney Jay Leiderman. “ Prosecutorial discretion is a great thing if it’s exercised, but it doesn’t happen in any meaningful way these days, because prosecutions are so politicized.”

That’s the crux of the problem for Keys, the former Reuters social-media editor and possessor of 23,000 Twitter followers. In December 2010, he crossed paths with Hector Xavier Monsegur, a.k.a. Sabu, the eventual leader of AntiSec, a more mischievous offshoot of hacktivist group Anonymous. Keys passed them the credentials he once used to log into KTXL’s computers, which were linked to the Tribune Company network.

Keys left KTXL two months earlier, and he’s since expressed surprise that the credentials still worked. An AntiSec member used them to access the L.A. Times website and change a story headline from “Pressure Builds in House to Pass Tax-cut Package” to “Pressure Builds in House to Elect CHIPPY 1337,” a reference to another hacker group. Within 30 minutes, the hacker was frozen out and the headline corrected.

Keys might have expected, at worse, a stiff warning and small fine. But he literally messed with the wrong guy. Sabu had been an FBI informant since his arrest in June 2011, right around the time he started AntiSec.


“Any case that has the word ’cyber’ in it brings headlines, because it’s interesting. There’s a degree to which careers are made this way,” says Leiderman. “’Cyber prosecutor blah-blah-blah.’ Nobody reads the ’blah-blah-blah.’ They just go, ’They caught a cybercriminal. Fantastic.’”

From: Is former Sacramento media employee Matthew Keys a victim of overzealous, misguided cybercrime prosecution?


4 thoughts on “Jay Leiderman Quoted: Prosecutorial discretion: let’s haul that kid in front of the judge to scare him – NOT

  1. What i don’t understood is actually how you’re not actually a lot more smartly-preferred than you
    may be right now. You’re very intelligent. You realize therefore significantly in terms of this matter,
    made me individually consider it from a lot of
    various angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to
    be involved until it’s something to accomplish with Lady gaga!
    Your individual stuffs excellent. At all times deal
    with it up!

  2. given the weathermen do not determine such, given the further that we mobilized, oay. The planet does not depend upon vegetayion. We not only have but are the source of our own sunshine-changing technology. Nothing’s like the old days. Chow is chowed. Endeavor yochange INTO deset rock. I won’t have to feed or explain ivitable elementary flaws. We are not mean aso far as long as we stand a chancto be judged as lizards. Interesed?

    I too, malfeasance in re Candida, or whatever disas wears a prosecutor’s execution hood, an outfit. Like Torquemada, Clamydia.

  3. I just saw that video on your twitter, by Vivienne Weisman. That’s something. You know, if the story of the Sony hack is bigger, and they caved in because of a new shark pond world we are in, we are facing cut loose, adrift, no information. I guess in all you make, enough saw the problem to produce this great work from the heart. Thank you. I’m going on Prometheus, chained to a rock. I need working room. At noon! Good lucky days.

  4. Everyone loves what you are up too. This type of clever work and reporting! Keep up the great works guys I’ve you guys to blogroll.

Comments are closed.